summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/game_coordinator.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/game_coordinator.md')
-rw-r--r--docs/game_coordinator.md64
1 files changed, 64 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/game_coordinator.md b/docs/game_coordinator.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e8260f2e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/game_coordinator.md
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# Game Coordinator
+
+To allow two players to play together, OpenTTD uses a Game Coordinator to
+facilitate this.
+
+When a server starts, it can register itself to the Game Coordinator. This
+happens when `server_game_type` is set to either `invite-only` or `public`.
+Upon registration, the Game Coordinator probes the network of the server, and
+assigns the server an unique code, called an `invite code`.
+
+When a client wants to join a server, it asks the Game Coordinator to help
+with this by giving it the `invite code` of the server. The Game Coordinator
+will, in this order, attempt several ways to connect the client and server
+together:
+
+## 1) Via direct IPv4 / IPv6
+
+Upon registration, the Game Coordinator probes the server to see if a
+direction connection to the server is possible based on the game port. It
+tries this over the public IPv4 and IPv6, as announced by the server.
+If either (or both) are successful, a client will always be asked to try
+these direct IPs first when it wants to connect to this server.
+
+- If the server is IPv4 only, the client is only asked to connect via IPv4.
+- If the server is IPv6 only, the client is only asked to connect via IPv6.
+- If the server is both IPv4 and IPv6, the client is asked to connect to to
+ one of those first. If that fails, it is asked to connect to the other.
+ Whether it tries IPv4 or IPv6 first, strongly depends on several network
+ infrastructure related events. The biggest influence is the network
+ latency over both protocols to the OpenTTD infrastructure.
+
+In the end, if either the server is not reachable directly from the Internet
+or the client fails to connect to either one of them, the connection attempt
+continues with the next available method.
+
+## 2) Via STUN
+
+When a client wants to join a server via STUN, both the client and server
+are asked to create a connection to the STUN server (normally
+`stun.openttd.org`) via both IPv4 and IPv6. If the client or server has no
+IPv4 or IPv6, it will not make a connection attempt via that protocol.
+
+The STUN server collects the public IPv4 and/or IPv6 of the client and server,
+together with the port the connection came in from. For most NAT gateways it
+holds true that as long as you use the same local IP + port, your public
+IP + port will remain the same, and allow for bi-directional communication.
+And this fact is used to later on pair the client and server.
+
+The STUN server reports this information directly to the Game Coordinator
+(this in contrast to most STUN implementation, where this information is
+first reported back to the peer itself, which has to relay it back to the
+coordinator. OpenTTD skips this step, as the STUN server can directly talk to
+the Game Coordinator). When the Game Coordinator sees a matching pair (in
+terms of IPv4 / IPv6), it will ask both the client and server to connect to
+their peer based on this public IP + port.
+
+As the NAT gateway forwards the traffic on the public IP + port to the local
+port, this creates a bi-directional socket between client and server. The
+connection to the STUN server can now safely be closed, and the client and
+server can continue to talk to each other.
+
+Some NAT gateways do not allow this method; for those this attempt will fail,
+and this also means that it is not possible to create a connection between
+the client and server.