1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
|
#serial 1
dnl Just like AC_C_CONST from autoconf-2.12, but with an initializer
dnl for `charset x' and with
dnl AC_DEFINE(const, )
dnl changed to
dnl AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(const, [/* empty */])
dnl to avoid this warning:
dnl [...]/m4: Warning: Excess arguments to built-in `define' ignored
undefine([AC_C_CONST])
AC_DEFUN(AC_C_CONST,
[dnl This message is consistent in form with the other checking messages,
dnl and with the result message.
AC_CACHE_CHECK([for working const], ac_cv_c_const,
[AC_TRY_COMPILE(,
changequote(<<, >>)dnl
<<
/* Ultrix mips cc rejects this. */
typedef int charset[2]; const charset x = {0, 0};
/* SunOS 4.1.1 cc rejects this. */
char const *const *ccp;
char **p;
/* NEC SVR4.0.2 mips cc rejects this. */
struct point {int x, y;};
static struct point const zero = {0,0};
/* AIX XL C 1.02.0.0 rejects this.
It does not let you subtract one const X* pointer from another in an arm
of an if-expression whose if-part is not a constant expression */
const char *g = "string";
ccp = &g + (g ? g-g : 0);
/* HPUX 7.0 cc rejects these. */
++ccp;
p = (char**) ccp;
ccp = (char const *const *) p;
{ /* SCO 3.2v4 cc rejects this. */
char *t;
char const *s = 0 ? (char *) 0 : (char const *) 0;
*t++ = 0;
}
{ /* Someone thinks the Sun supposedly-ANSI compiler will reject this. */
int x[] = {25, 17};
const int *foo = &x[0];
++foo;
}
{ /* Sun SC1.0 ANSI compiler rejects this -- but not the above. */
typedef const int *iptr;
iptr p = 0;
++p;
}
{ /* AIX XL C 1.02.0.0 rejects this saying
"k.c", line 2.27: 1506-025 (S) Operand must be a modifiable lvalue. */
struct s { int j; const int *ap[3]; };
struct s *b; b->j = 5;
}
{ /* ULTRIX-32 V3.1 (Rev 9) vcc rejects this */
const int foo = 10;
}
>>,
changequote([, ])dnl
ac_cv_c_const=yes, ac_cv_c_const=no)])
if test $ac_cv_c_const = no; then
AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(const, [/* empty */])
fi
])
|
