| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
requiredby for 'already installed' packages, so the test didn't work
properly. Once these errors were fixed, both tests pass fine.
|
|
for and is a dependency of another package. (upgrade057)
* Removed man2html stuff from doc/Makefile.am.
* Patch: improved depends checking in _alpm_checkdeps
Nagy Gabor <ngaba@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu>
* Slight revisions to pmrule.py to allow for a PKG_PROVIDES test.
* Very quick updates to the pactest README.
* Added rules to some of the newer upgrade tests. Note: upgrade055 now fails
due to requiredby entries not being written packages that are dependencies
in a provides role.
|
|
|
|
deal with. Currently, libalpm with AND without Nagy's patch fails it.
* Slight spacing update to pmenv.py.
|
|
* Added the actual "Nagy's bug" as upgrade055.py.
* Updated the Makefile to distribute the pactest readme.
* Removed COPYING from the pactest directory- see COPYING at the root for the
same license.
|
|
add the "requiredby" information that libalpm would have written.
Now it succeeds.
|
|
provides, and conflicts.
- upgrade051 is known to fail- but we want to eventually make it work.
- upgrade052 is Nagy's bug as reported on the ML- I think. If it isn't,
let me know.
|
|
"replaces confusion" thread on pacman-dev for more information
* Cleaned up some 2 item loops in the sync131 test
|
|
|
|
descriptions, additional rules, etc)
* One new pactest test regarding file migration between packages.
* Fix of a little output bug in pmenv.py
|
|
it's a PEP)
* Modified some sync tests
|
|
the check that pkg1 is modified and pkg2 does not exist is good enough for this
use-case. Now we have a 100% pactest success
|
|
http://aurelien.foret.free.fr/archlinux/pactest/
|
