summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/vendor/ezyang/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/ezyang/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt')
-rw-r--r--vendor/ezyang/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt83
1 files changed, 83 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/ezyang/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt b/vendor/ezyang/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..58c81dc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/ezyang/htmlpurifier/library/HTMLPurifier/ConfigSchema/schema/URI.Munge.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+URI.Munge
+TYPE: string/null
+VERSION: 1.3.0
+DEFAULT: NULL
+--DESCRIPTION--
+
+<p>
+ Munges all browsable (usually http, https and ftp)
+ absolute URIs into another URI, usually a URI redirection service.
+ This directive accepts a URI, formatted with a <code>%s</code> where
+ the url-encoded original URI should be inserted (sample:
+ <code>http://www.google.com/url?q=%s</code>).
+</p>
+<p>
+ Uses for this directive:
+</p>
+<ul>
+ <li>
+ Prevent PageRank leaks, while being fairly transparent
+ to users (you may also want to add some client side JavaScript to
+ override the text in the statusbar). <strong>Notice</strong>:
+ Many security experts believe that this form of protection does not deter spam-bots.
+ </li>
+ <li>
+ Redirect users to a splash page telling them they are leaving your
+ website. While this is poor usability practice, it is often mandated
+ in corporate environments.
+ </li>
+</ul>
+<p>
+ Prior to HTML Purifier 3.1.1, this directive also enabled the munging
+ of browsable external resources, which could break things if your redirection
+ script was a splash page or used <code>meta</code> tags. To revert to
+ previous behavior, please use %URI.MungeResources.
+</p>
+<p>
+ You may want to also use %URI.MungeSecretKey along with this directive
+ in order to enforce what URIs your redirector script allows. Open
+ redirector scripts can be a security risk and negatively affect the
+ reputation of your domain name.
+</p>
+<p>
+ Starting with HTML Purifier 3.1.1, there is also these substitutions:
+</p>
+<table>
+ <thead>
+ <tr>
+ <th>Key</th>
+ <th>Description</th>
+ <th>Example <code>&lt;a href=""&gt;</code></th>
+ </tr>
+ </thead>
+ <tbody>
+ <tr>
+ <td>%r</td>
+ <td>1 - The URI embeds a resource<br />(blank) - The URI is merely a link</td>
+ <td></td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>%n</td>
+ <td>The name of the tag this URI came from</td>
+ <td>a</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>%m</td>
+ <td>The name of the attribute this URI came from</td>
+ <td>href</td>
+ </tr>
+ <tr>
+ <td>%p</td>
+ <td>The name of the CSS property this URI came from, or blank if irrelevant</td>
+ <td></td>
+ </tr>
+ </tbody>
+</table>
+<p>
+ Admittedly, these letters are somewhat arbitrary; the only stipulation
+ was that they couldn't be a through f. r is for resource (I would have preferred
+ e, but you take what you can get), n is for name, m
+ was picked because it came after n (and I couldn't use a), p is for
+ property.
+</p>
+--# vim: et sw=4 sts=4