| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We've already done these during download_sources().
|
|
Slightly more verbose, but also more understandable.
|
|
download_sources(), while the first invocation of makepkg, is a rather
odd place for this kind of guard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 58968cf fixed symlinks for package products in $startdir in
light of the simplified chroot setup. However, a similar change needs
to be made for source-package products. This was an easy omission to
make because makechrootpkg does not produce source-pakcages by
default.
|
|
The added PKGBUILD.proto file is so that shellcheck can know know what
to expect that a PKGBUILD sets.
|
|
- Use `read -r` instead of other forms of read or looping
- Use arrays instead of strings with whitespaces.
- In one instance, use ${var%%.*} instead of $(echo $var|cut -f. -d1)
|
|
These changes are all strictly "slap some double-quotes in there".
Anything more than that is not included in this commit.
|
|
These are purely stylistic changes that make shellcheck complain less.
This does NOT include things like quoting currently unquoted variables.
|
|
|
|
The bug isn't currently triggered, but I accidentally did trigger when I
was trying to modify the command a bit. I figure a "caution" sign would be
helpful to any future developers.
|
|
The default m4 quote characters: `QUOTE' are troublesome, because ` is
fairly likely to pop up in a shell script (if not for a subshell, because
it is a useful character in comments and user-facing messages).
So, this changes it to [[[QUOTE]]], as it is unlikely to see three braces
together like that, let alone in unbalanced sets.
|
|
The absence of it was allowing an (m4-produced) syntax error in
in a change I had made to be masked.
|
|
What this is really doing is fixing a conflict that I had incorrectly
resolved when rebasing what became 2fd5931 onto cda9cf4. Of course,
because of dynamic scoping, everything worked out, and everything worked as
intended.
Before cda9cf4, it was appropriate for download_sources to take src_owner
as an argument, but after cda9cf4, it is now appropriate to take
makepkg_user as an argument. However, it still takes src_owner as an
argument, but pays 0 attention to it; instead looking at makepkg_user which
it happily inherited because of dynamic scoping.
So change it to take makepkg_user as the argument.
|
|
The `-xdev` flag to `find` makes it not recurse over subvolumes; so it only
supports recursion with depth=1. Fix this by having the function
recursively call itself.
|
|
This is inspired by the thought that went in to the delete_chroot
is_subvolume commit.
sync_chroot($chrootdir, $copydir) copies `$chrootdir/root` to `$copydir`.
That seems a little silly; why do we care about "$chrootdir"? Have it just
be sync_chroot(source, destination) like every other sync/copy command.
Where this becomes tricky is check to decide if we are going to use btrfs
subvolumes or not. We don't care if "$source/.." is on btrfs; the root
could be a directly-mounted subvolume, but and the destination could be
another subvolume of the same btrfs mounted somewhere else.
The things we do care about are:
- The source is a btrfs subvolume (so that we can snapshot it)
- The source is on the same filesystem as the directory that the copy will
be created in.
- If the destination exists:
* that it is not a mountpoint (so that we can delete and recreate it)
* that it is a btrfs subvolume (so that we can quickly delete it)
On the last point, it isn't necessary for creating the new snapshot, just
for quick deletion. That can be a separate check, where we use regular
`rm` for deleting the existing copy, but use subvolume snapshots for
creating the new one.
|
|
Also, shorten the "Synchronizing" message to only include the full path
to the copy if it was specified.
The capslocked variable names in the Usage comment were references to
things in Parabola's tools, that didn't make much sense here out of
context.
|
|
First of all, it ran `is_btrfs "$chrootdir"` to decide if it was on
btrfs, but $chrootdir wasn't defined locally; it just happens to work
because $chrootdir was defined in main(). (I noticed this because in
Parabola, it is called differently, so $chrootdir was empty).
So I was tempted to just change it to `is_btrfs "$copydir"`, but if
$copydir is just a regular directory on a btrfs filesystem, then it
It would leave much of $copydir intact. What we really care about is
if $copydir is a btrfs subvolume; which we can check by combining the
is_btrfs check with inspecting the inum of the directory.
I put this combined check in lib/archroot.sh:is_subvolume.
https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2013-September/003901.html
|
|
|
|
We've already done these during download_sources().
|
|
Slightly more verbose, but also more understandable.
|
|
download_sources(), while the first invocation of makepkg, is a rather
odd place for this kind of guard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commit 58968cf fixed symlinks for package products in $startdir in
light of the simplified chroot setup. However, a similar change needs
to be made for source-package products. This was an easy omission to
make because makechrootpkg does not produce source-pakcages by
default.
|
|
The added PKGBUILD.proto file is so that shellcheck can know know what
to expect that a PKGBUILD sets.
|
|
- Use `read -r` instead of other forms of read or looping
- Use arrays instead of strings with whitespaces.
- In one instance, use ${var%%.*} instead of $(echo $var|cut -f. -d1)
|
|
These changes are all strictly "slap some double-quotes in there".
Anything more than that is not included in this commit.
|
|
These are purely stylistic changes that make shellcheck complain less.
This does NOT include things like quoting currently unquoted variables.
|
|
|
|
The bug isn't currently triggered, but I accidentally did trigger when I
was trying to modify the command a bit. I figure a "caution" sign would be
helpful to any future developers.
|
|
The default m4 quote characters: `QUOTE' are troublesome, because ` is
fairly likely to pop up in a shell script (if not for a subshell, because
it is a useful character in comments and user-facing messages).
So, this changes it to [[[QUOTE]]], as it is unlikely to see three braces
together like that, let alone in unbalanced sets.
|
|
The absence of it was allowing an (m4-produced) syntax error in
in a change I had made to be masked.
|
|
What this is really doing is fixing a conflict that I had incorrectly
resolved when rebasing what became 2fd5931 onto cda9cf4. Of course,
because of dynamic scoping, everything worked out, and everything worked as
intended.
Before cda9cf4, it was appropriate for download_sources to take src_owner
as an argument, but after cda9cf4, it is now appropriate to take
makepkg_user as an argument. However, it still takes src_owner as an
argument, but pays 0 attention to it; instead looking at makepkg_user which
it happily inherited because of dynamic scoping.
So change it to take makepkg_user as the argument.
|
|
The `-xdev` flag to `find` makes it not recurse over subvolumes; so it only
supports recursion with depth=1. Fix this by having the function
recursively call itself.
|
|
This is inspired by the thought that went in to the delete_chroot
is_subvolume commit.
sync_chroot($chrootdir, $copydir) copies `$chrootdir/root` to `$copydir`.
That seems a little silly; why do we care about "$chrootdir"? Have it just
be sync_chroot(source, destination) like every other sync/copy command.
Where this becomes tricky is check to decide if we are going to use btrfs
subvolumes or not. We don't care if "$source/.." is on btrfs; the root
could be a directly-mounted subvolume, but and the destination could be
another subvolume of the same btrfs mounted somewhere else.
The things we do care about are:
- The source is a btrfs subvolume (so that we can snapshot it)
- The source is on the same filesystem as the directory that the copy will
be created in.
- If the destination exists:
* that it is not a mountpoint (so that we can delete and recreate it)
* that it is a btrfs subvolume (so that we can quickly delete it)
On the last point, it isn't necessary for creating the new snapshot, just
for quick deletion. That can be a separate check, where we use regular
`rm` for deleting the existing copy, but use subvolume snapshots for
creating the new one.
|
