diff options
author | Luke Shumaker <lukeshu@parabola.nu> | 2017-05-05 18:41:00 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Erich Eckner <git@eckner.net> | 2017-07-14 06:54:28 +0200 |
commit | e9e3fc8b50b1b492f0ee77bd503a729bfc2c98fe (patch) | |
tree | c92e5574dc7bf11a536a043011bb4e7f272c2c89 /makepkg-i686.conf | |
parent | 89e08408ff3e28268a992c5279713c8cf44d7eef (diff) | |
download | devtools32-e9e3fc8b50b1b492f0ee77bd503a729bfc2c98fe.tar.xz |
makechrootpkg: sync_chroot: Make more general.
This is inspired by the thought that went in to the delete_chroot
is_subvolume commit.
sync_chroot($chrootdir, $copydir) copies `$chrootdir/root` to `$copydir`.
That seems a little silly; why do we care about "$chrootdir"? Have it just
be sync_chroot(source, destination) like every other sync/copy command.
Where this becomes tricky is check to decide if we are going to use btrfs
subvolumes or not. We don't care if "$source/.." is on btrfs; the root
could be a directly-mounted subvolume, but and the destination could be
another subvolume of the same btrfs mounted somewhere else.
The things we do care about are:
- The source is a btrfs subvolume (so that we can snapshot it)
- The source is on the same filesystem as the directory that the copy will
be created in.
- If the destination exists:
* that it is not a mountpoint (so that we can delete and recreate it)
* that it is a btrfs subvolume (so that we can quickly delete it)
On the last point, it isn't necessary for creating the new snapshot, just
for quick deletion. That can be a separate check, where we use regular
`rm` for deleting the existing copy, but use subvolume snapshots for
creating the new one.
Diffstat (limited to 'makepkg-i686.conf')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions