Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
non-release builds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a C++11 feature that allows the compiler to check that a virtual
member declaration overrides a base-class member with the same signature.
Also src/blitter/32bpp_anim_sse4.hpp +38 is no longer erroneously marked
as virtual despite being a template.
|
|
If it was compiled with MingW, both / and \ were accepted as
path separator. On MSVC, only \ was. This is an unexpected
difference between binaries for the same platform. Remove this
discrepancy by accepting both / and \ on all platforms.
|
|
In 10 years there is no commit to change how MorphOS works, and we
have no active maintainer for it. It is unlikely it works in its
current state (but not impossible).
With the arrival of SDL2 (and removal of SDL), MorphOS is no longer
support. There is an SDL2 port for MorphOS, but it is not maintained
by upstream SDL2, and nobody can currently test it out.
If anyone wants to re-add MorphOS, please do (revert this patch,
fix the problems, and create a Pull Request). If you need any help
doing so, let us know! It is not that we don't like MorphOS, it is
that we don't have anyone fixing the problems :(
|
|
|
|
macro _WIN32
|
|
|
|
|
|
of data in strgen
|
|
|
|
the return is not NULL)
|
|
|
|
and strecat.
|
|
"unsafe" functions to prevent them from being used, and thus having to care about certain aspects of their return values
|
|
|
|
|
|
command classification from strgen_tables.h instead of using something incompletely duplicated.
|
|
Eagle_rainbow)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
creates the actual .lng files
|
|
strgen classes
|
|
with the same master language instance in a single strgen run
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
allocating and freeing its memory, and don't use a global variable for the string data
|
|
really needed
|
|
|
|
|
|
and translation files
|
|
always be false at the point it would be read
|
|
consistent
|
|
language file
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change: strgen no longer writes the type of a string for a gender choice list
|
|
|
|
ifs where we already know the result
|
|
large arguments
|