| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
CreateNewIndustryHelper().
|
|
succeeded or failed command.
|
|
the way" showed the to-be-built industry twice, instead of the to-be-built industry and the industry that's in the way
|
|
replaced by 'site unsuitable'.
|
|
CheckIfCallBackAllowsCreation().
|
|
CheckIfIndustryTilesAreFree().
|
|
|
|
CheckIfIndustryIsAllowed() and CheckIfFarEnoughFromIndustry().
|
|
available.
|
|
|
|
FindTownForIndustry().
|
|
generator.
|
|
|
|
|
|
incorrectly and in some cases circumvented the density difficulty setting.
-Change: Do not scale the number of industry creations during map creation with the number of available industry types.
-Feature: [NewGRF] Implement special industry flag 0x10000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
properly check for crossing north border of map. Also don't consider MP_VOID tiles as water.
|
|
also for drawing of default industries. They are compatible since the bubblegenerator is also randomly recoloured.
|
|
|
|
wrapper functions
|
|
if a header require a header make it include that header
|
|
when building a station could be incorrect (missing a cargo)
-Change [NoAI]: AITile::GetCargoProduction now returns the number of producers and not the number of tiles of producers.
-Fix [NoAI]: AITileList_IndustryProducing would omit some tiles for at which a station would get cargo.
|
|
|
|
variables. Also make use of TileArea functions for determining the 'width' and 'height' of an industry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
on water were not marked dirty
|
|
|
|
building/removing unmovables (new objects), building/removing rail-waypoints/buoys, interacting with town-authority, building foundations, funding primary industries (when not prospecting) and towns.
If a GRF does not set price multipliers for these new prices, but for the previously used ones, the old modifiers will be propagated to the new bases.
|
|
and use 8 * cost_multiplier instead.
|
|
producer (instead of once pre produced cargo type) (fonsinchen)
|
|
|
|
|
|
including of newgrf_cargo.h
|
|
|
|
no industry layout defined; yes, it's very similar to r17633 because one case was forgotten.
|
|
that has no industry layout defined.
|
|
amount is 0
|
|
industry tiles accept it but industry itself doesn't
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for more consistency and distinguishability.
|
|
tile after two '0x18' industry tiles
|
|
industry removal causing the removed industry to be still in the list after removal
|
