Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This was already removed from the "ci-build", but not yet from
"release".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was already applied on the CI build, but not yet on the
release build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because certain files are read-only, the "restore-cache" step
fails, as Windows tar refuses to overwrite those files (even
if they are identical). Instead of hoping upstream fixes
"restore-cache", just remove the read-only flag on these files
instead.
|
|
directories ourselves
|
|
We use CMakeListsTxtAdvanced, and as such, we have to do this our
self via "-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo". Otherwise we are
producing Debug builds instead of Release builds. Oops.
|
|
|
|
This has several ways of being triggered:
- When creating a new release via the GitHub interface. Fully
automated that will produce new binaries, upload them, and it
will even update the website to tell about the new version.
- When triggered in an automated way from OpenTTD/workflows to
start a nightly.
- Manually via the Release workflow, which accepts branches,
Pull Requests and tags to build.
Rerunning a job is safe and should be without issues. Everything
retriggers and updates what-ever might have been broken. In fact,
except for dates, it should produce identical results.
Co-authored-by: Charles Pigott <charlespigott@googlemail.com>
|
|
When a developer attaches the "preview" label, a build is created
and published on https://preview.openttd.org/. After that, new
pushes to the PR are automatically build (as long as the "preview"
label exists).
If a non-developer attaches the "preview" label, it will be
removed.
|
|
Emscripten compiles to WASM, which can be loaded via
HTML / JavaScript. This allows you to play OpenTTD inside a
browser.
Co-authored-by: milek7 <me@milek7.pl>
|
|
Also, while at it, make it more like the upcoming release-workflow,
so they look a lot more similar.
Functional it should be the same, except that Windows should
now also output when a test fails.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stale bot checks if an issue hasn't had any attention in the last
60 days, or if a pull request hasn't had any attention in the last
30 days. If so, it marks it as stale. After 7 more days, it closes
the issue/pull request. Any activity on the issue/pull request
resets the timer.
This helps keeping the counter low, and the work manageable. There
is a lot of reasoning behind this idea, and other projects show it
really helps to keep the issue/pull request count low.
More information here: https://github.com/probot/stale
|