1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
#!/bin/sh
# Show fts fails on old-fashioned systems.
# Copyright (C) 2006-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Show that fts (hence du, chmod, chgrp, chown) fails when all of the
# following are true:
# - '.' is not readable
# - operating on a hierarchy containing a relative name longer than PATH_MAX
# - run on a system where gnulib's openat emulation must resort to using
# save_cwd and restore_cwd (which fail if '.' is not readable).
# Thus, the following du invocation should succeed on newer Linux and
# Solaris systems, yet it must fail on systems lacking both openat and
# /proc support. However, before coreutils-6.0 this test would fail even
# on Linux+PROC_FS systems because its fts implementation would revert
# unnecessarily to using FTS_NOCHDIR mode in this corner case.
. "${srcdir=.}/tests/init.sh"; path_prepend_ ./src
print_ver_ du
# ecryptfs for example uses some of the file name space
# for encrypting filenames, so we must check dynamically.
name_max=$(stat -f -c %l .)
test "$name_max" -ge '200' || skip_ "NAME_MAX=$name_max is not sufficient"
proc_file=/proc/self/fd
if test ! -d $proc_file; then
skip_ 'This test would fail, since your system lacks /proc support.'
fi
dir=$(printf '%200s\n' ' '|tr ' ' x)
# Construct a hierarchy containing a relative file with a name
# longer than PATH_MAX.
# for i in $(seq 52); do
# mkdir $dir || framework_failure_
# cd $dir || framework_failure_
# done
# cd $tmp || framework_failure_
# Sheesh. Bash 3.1.5 can't create this hierarchy. I get
# cd: error retrieving current directory: getcwd:
# cannot access parent directories:
# (all on one line).
cwd=$(pwd)
# Use perl instead:
: ${PERL=perl}
$PERL \
-e 'my $d = '$dir'; foreach my $i (1..52)' \
-e ' { mkdir ($d, 0700) && chdir $d or die "$!" }' \
|| framework_failure_
mkdir inaccessible || framework_failure_
cd inaccessible || framework_failure_
chmod 0 . || framework_failure_
du -s "$cwd/$dir" > /dev/null || fail=1
Exit $fail
|
