# Check for stdbool.h that conforms to C99. dnl Copyright (C) 2002-2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it, dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved. # Prepare for substituting if it is not supported. AC_DEFUN([AM_STDBOOL_H], [ AC_REQUIRE([AC_HEADER_STDBOOL]) # Define an additional variable used in the Makefile substitution. if test "$ac_cv_header_stdbool_h" = yes; then STDBOOL_H='' else STDBOOL_H='stdbool.h' fi AC_SUBST([STDBOOL_H]) ]) # AM_STDBOOL_H will be renamed to gl_STDBOOL_H in the future. AC_DEFUN([gl_STDBOOL_H], [AM_STDBOOL_H]) # This macro is only needed in autoconf <= 2.59. Newer versions of autoconf # have this macro built-in. AC_DEFUN([AC_HEADER_STDBOOL], [AC_CACHE_CHECK([for stdbool.h that conforms to C99], [ac_cv_header_stdbool_h], [AC_TRY_COMPILE( [ #include #ifndef bool "error: bool is not defined" #endif #ifndef false "error: false is not defined" #endif #if false "error: false is not 0" #endif #ifndef true "error: true is not defined" #endif #if true != 1 "error: true is not 1" #endif #ifndef __bool_true_false_are_defined "error: __bool_true_false_are_defined is not defined" #endif struct s { _Bool s: 1; _Bool t; } s; char a[true == 1 ? 1 : -1]; char b[false == 0 ? 1 : -1]; char c[__bool_true_false_are_defined == 1 ? 1 : -1]; char d[(bool) -0.5 == true ? 1 : -1]; bool e = &s; char f[(_Bool) -0.0 == false ? 1 : -1]; char g[true]; char h[sizeof (_Bool)]; char i[sizeof s.t]; enum { j = false, k = true, l = false * true, m = true * 256 }; _Bool n[m]; char o[sizeof n == m * sizeof n[0] ? 1 : -1]; char p[-1 - (_Bool) 0 < 0 && -1 - (bool) 0 < 0 ? 1 : -1]; #if defined __xlc__ || __GNUC__ /* Catch a bug in IBM AIX xlc compiler version 6.0.0.0 reported by James Lemley on 2005-10-05; see . This test is not quite right, since xlc is allowed to reject this program, as the initializer for xlcbug is not one of the forms that C requires support for. However, doing the test right would require a run-time test, and that would make cross-compilation harder. Let us hope that IBM fixes the xlc bug, and also adds support for this kind of constant expression. In the meantime, this test will reject xlc, which is OK, since our stdbool.h substitute should suffice. */ char digs[] = "0123456789"; int xlcbug = 1 / (&(digs + 5)[-2 + (bool) 1] == &digs[4] ? 1 : -1); #endif ], [ /* Refer to every declared value, to avoid compiler optimizations. */ return (!a + !b + !c + !d + !e + !f + !g + !h + !i + !!j + !k + !!l + !m + !n + !o + !p); ], [ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=yes], [ac_cv_header_stdbool_h=no])]) AC_CHECK_TYPES([_Bool]) if test $ac_cv_header_stdbool_h = yes; then AC_DEFINE(HAVE_STDBOOL_H, 1, [Define to 1 if stdbool.h conforms to C99.]) fi])