From 7df26ae6feb4fdbc5a67b2967a132e14d9fe0003 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:01:10 +0200 Subject: tests: avoid sort-spinlock-abuse false positive under heavy load * tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse: Classify as "very expensive" to avoid unwarranted failure once and for all. --- tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) (limited to 'tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse') diff --git a/tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse b/tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse index 4cf886660..0e1c86bc5 100755 --- a/tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse +++ b/tests/misc/sort-spinlock-abuse @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ . "${srcdir=.}/init.sh"; path_prepend_ ../src print_ver_ sort +# This isn't terribly expensive, but it must not be run under heavy load. +# Since the "very expensive" are already run only with -j1, adding this +# test to the list ensures it still gets _some_ (albeit minimal) coverage +# while not causing false-positive failures in day to day runs. +very_expensive_ + grep '^#define HAVE_PTHREAD_T 1' "$CONFIG_HEADER" > /dev/null || skip_ 'requires pthreads' -- cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf