From 972967903de659ed0aa367913f131855f8f72835 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pádraig Brady <P@draigBrady.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 01:06:10 +0000
Subject: doc: pathchk description enhancements

* doc/coreutils.texi (pathchk invocation): Mention pathchk
checks validity (for current system) as well as portability.
Say messages go to stderr, and reorder description of checks
done for the -p option, to match what's done in code.
* src/pathchk.c (usage): Mention pathchk checks name validity.
Suggested clarifications were from Dan Jacobson.
---
 src/pathchk.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src/pathchk.c')

diff --git a/src/pathchk.c b/src/pathchk.c
index 3b2bd467b..5dbc7da68 100644
--- a/src/pathchk.c
+++ b/src/pathchk.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ usage (int status)
     {
       printf (_("Usage: %s [OPTION]... NAME...\n"), program_name);
       fputs (_("\
-Diagnose unportable constructs in NAME.\n\
+Diagnose invalid or unportable file names.\n\
 \n\
   -p                  check for most POSIX systems\n\
   -P                  check for empty names and leading \"-\"\n\
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf