From eaa373aeb64ad85ff0f8414bbc4b8484047a6e1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 07:33:43 +0000
Subject: [struct dummy]: Renamed.  Don't rely on portability of zero-length
 arrays.  Instead, use sizes of -1 or +1.

---
 src/od.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/od.c')

diff --git a/src/od.c b/src/od.c
index 0cc3b0c93..2e3f7f9f2 100644
--- a/src/od.c
+++ b/src/od.c
@@ -153,10 +153,10 @@ static const int width_bytes[] =
 
 /* Ensure that for each member of `enum size_spec' there is an
    initializer in the width_bytes array.  */
-struct assert_width_bytes_matches_size_spec_decl
+struct dummy
 {
-  int t1[sizeof width_bytes / sizeof width_bytes[0] - N_SIZE_SPECS];
-  int t2[N_SIZE_SPECS - sizeof width_bytes / sizeof width_bytes[0]];
+  int assert_width_bytes_matches_size_spec_decl
+    [sizeof width_bytes / sizeof width_bytes[0] == N_SIZE_SPECS ? 1 : -1];
 };
 
 /* Names for some non-printing characters.  */
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf