From 27873f1deb69745c79d403bbb8e1145bc18f55b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pádraig Brady
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:41:42 +0100
Subject: shuf: use memory more efficiently when returning a subset
* gl/lib/randperm.c (randperm_new): When the number of items
to return H, is much smaller than the total number of items N,
use a hash to represent the sparse permutations of the set N.
This is currently enabled for N > 128K and N/H > 32.
* tests/misc/shuf: Ensure shuf can quickly return 2 numbers
from a large range.
* gl/modules/randperm: Depend on hash.
* NEWS: Mention the change.
---
gl/lib/randperm.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
gl/modules/randperm | 1 +
2 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
(limited to 'gl')
diff --git a/gl/lib/randperm.c b/gl/lib/randperm.c
index 97c8d9a8b..26181b8a6 100644
--- a/gl/lib/randperm.c
+++ b/gl/lib/randperm.c
@@ -19,9 +19,11 @@
#include
+#include "hash.h"
#include "randperm.h"
#include
+#include
#include "xalloc.h"
@@ -57,6 +59,94 @@ randperm_bound (size_t h, size_t n)
return bound;
}
+/* Swap elements I and J in array V. */
+
+static void
+swap (size_t *v, size_t i, size_t j)
+{
+ size_t t = v[i];
+ v[i] = v[j];
+ v[j] = t;
+}
+
+/* Structures and functions for a sparse_map abstract data type that's
+ used to effectively swap elements I and J in array V like swap(),
+ but in a more memory efficient manner (when the number of permutations
+ performed is significantly less than the size of the input). */
+
+struct sparse_ent_
+{
+ size_t index;
+ size_t val;
+};
+
+static size_t
+sparse_hash_ (void const *x, size_t table_size)
+{
+ struct sparse_ent_ const *ent = x;
+ return ent->index % table_size;
+}
+
+static bool
+sparse_cmp_ (void const *x, void const *y)
+{
+ struct sparse_ent_ const *ent1 = x;
+ struct sparse_ent_ const *ent2 = y;
+ return ent1->index == ent2->index;
+}
+
+typedef Hash_table sparse_map;
+
+/* Initialize the structure for the sparse map,
+ when a best guess as to the number of entries
+ specified with SIZE_HINT. */
+
+static sparse_map *
+sparse_new (size_t size_hint)
+{
+ return hash_initialize (size_hint, NULL, sparse_hash_, sparse_cmp_, free);
+}
+
+/* Swap the values for I and J. If a value is not already present
+ then assume it's equal to the index. Update the value for
+ index I in array V. */
+
+static void
+sparse_swap (sparse_map *sv, size_t* v, size_t i, size_t j)
+{
+ struct sparse_ent_ *v1 = hash_delete (sv, &(struct sparse_ent_) {i,0});
+ struct sparse_ent_ *v2 = hash_delete (sv, &(struct sparse_ent_) {j,0});
+
+ /* FIXME: reduce the frequency of these mallocs. */
+ if (!v1)
+ {
+ v1 = xmalloc (sizeof *v1);
+ v1->index = v1->val = i;
+ }
+ if (!v2)
+ {
+ v2 = xmalloc (sizeof *v2);
+ v2->index = v2->val = j;
+ }
+
+ size_t t = v1->val;
+ v1->val = v2->val;
+ v2->val = t;
+ if (!hash_insert (sv, v1))
+ xalloc_die ();
+ if (!hash_insert (sv, v2))
+ xalloc_die ();
+
+ v[i] = v1->val;
+}
+
+static void
+sparse_free (sparse_map *sv)
+{
+ hash_free (sv);
+}
+
+
/* From R, allocate and return a malloc'd array of the first H elements
of a random permutation of N elements. H must not exceed N.
Return NULL if H is zero. */
@@ -79,21 +169,66 @@ randperm_new (struct randint_source *r, size_t h, size_t n)
default:
{
+ /* The algorithm is essentially the same in both
+ the sparse and non sparse case. In the sparse case we use
+ a hash to implement sparse storage for the set of n numbers
+ we're shuffling. When to use the sparse method was
+ determined with the help of this script:
+
+ #!/bin/sh
+ for n in $(seq 2 32); do
+ for h in $(seq 2 32); do
+ test $h -gt $n && continue
+ for s in o n; do
+ test $s = o && shuf=shuf || shuf=./shuf
+ num=$(env time -f "$s:${h},${n} = %e,%M" \
+ $shuf -i0-$((2**$n-2)) -n$((2**$h-2)) | wc -l)
+ test $num = $((2**$h-2)) || echo "$s:${h},${n} = failed" >&2
+ done
+ done
+ done
+
+ This showed that if sparseness = n/h, then:
+
+ sparseness = 128 => .125 mem used, and about same speed
+ sparseness = 64 => .25 mem used, but 1.5 times slower
+ sparseness = 32 => .5 mem used, but 2 times slower
+
+ Also the memory usage was only significant when n > 128Ki
+ */
+ bool sparse = (n >= (128 * 1024)) && (n / h >= 32);
+
size_t i;
+ sparse_map *sv;
- v = xnmalloc (n, sizeof *v);
- for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
- v[i] = i;
+ if (sparse)
+ {
+ sv = sparse_new (h * 2);
+ if (sv == NULL)
+ xalloc_die ();
+ v = xnmalloc (h, sizeof *v);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ sv = NULL; /* To placate GCC's -Wuninitialized. */
+ v = xnmalloc (n, sizeof *v);
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ v[i] = i;
+ }
for (i = 0; i < h; i++)
{
size_t j = i + randint_choose (r, n - i);
- size_t t = v[i];
- v[i] = v[j];
- v[j] = t;
+ if (sparse)
+ sparse_swap (sv, v, i, j);
+ else
+ swap (v, i, j);
}
- v = xnrealloc (v, h, sizeof *v);
+ if (sparse)
+ sparse_free (sv);
+ else
+ v = xnrealloc (v, h, sizeof *v);
}
break;
}
diff --git a/gl/modules/randperm b/gl/modules/randperm
index 9cef78271..daf9e3215 100644
--- a/gl/modules/randperm
+++ b/gl/modules/randperm
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ lib/randperm.h
Depends-on:
randint
xalloc
+hash
configure.ac:
--
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2