summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--HACKING31
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/HACKING b/HACKING
index 3b7b4082e..436341823 100644
--- a/HACKING
+++ b/HACKING
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ Once your change is committed, you can create a proper patch that includes
a log message and authorship information as well as any permissions
changes. Use this command to save that single, most-recent change set:
- git format-patch --stdout --signoff HEAD~1 > DIFF
+ git format-patch --stdout HEAD~1 > DIFF
The trouble with this approach is that you've just checked in a change
(remember, it's only local) on the "master" branch, and that's where new
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ It's easy to adjust:
edit your files # this can include running "git add NEW" or "git rm BAD"
git commit --amend -e -a
- git format-patch --stdout --signoff HEAD~1 > your-branch.diff
+ git format-patch --stdout HEAD~1 > your-branch.diff
That replaces the most recent change-set with the revised one.
@@ -211,6 +211,13 @@ line should be blank, and the remaining lines are usually ChangeLog-style
entries for all affected files. Omit the leading TABs that you're used
to seeing in a "real" ChangeLog file.
+Try to make the summary line fit one of the following forms:
+
+ program_name: change-description
+ prog1, prog2: change-description
+ doc: change-description
+ tests: change-description
+
Use SPACE-only indentation in new files.
========================================
@@ -245,6 +252,26 @@ doc/*.texi. The man pages are generated from --help output, so
you shouldn't need to change anything under man/. User-visible changes
are usually documented in NEWS, too.
+When writing prose (documentation, comments, log entries), use an
+active voice, not a passive one. I.e., say "print the frobnozzle",
+not "the frobnozzle will be printed".
+
+
+Minor syntactic preferences
+===========================
+[I hesitate to write this one down, because it appears to be an
+ acquired taste, at least for native-English speakers. It seems odd
+ (if not truly backwards) to nearly anyone who doesn't have a strong
+ mathematics background and perhaps a streak of something odd in their
+ character ;-) ]
+In writing arithmetic comparisons, use "<" and "<=" rather than
+">" and ">=". For some justification, read this:
+ http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/3903/focus=4126
+
+const placement:
+Write "Type const *var", not "const Type *var".
+FIXME: dig up justification
+
Add tests
==========