summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/imap/docs/calendar.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEduardo Chappa <echappa@gmx.com>2013-02-03 00:59:38 -0700
committerEduardo Chappa <echappa@gmx.com>2013-02-03 00:59:38 -0700
commit094ca96844842928810f14844413109fc6cdd890 (patch)
treee60efbb980f38ba9308ccb4fb2b77b87bbc115f3 /imap/docs/calendar.txt
downloadalpine-094ca96844842928810f14844413109fc6cdd890.tar.xz
Initial Alpine Version
Diffstat (limited to 'imap/docs/calendar.txt')
-rw-r--r--imap/docs/calendar.txt332
1 files changed, 332 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/imap/docs/calendar.txt b/imap/docs/calendar.txt
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..c1009078
--- /dev/null
+++ b/imap/docs/calendar.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+/* ========================================================================
+ * Copyright 1988-2006 University of Washington
+ *
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ *
+ * ========================================================================
+ */
+
+ ALL ABOUT CALENDARS
+
+ Although one can never be sure of what will happen at some future
+time, there is strong historical precedent for presuming that the
+present Gregorian calendar will still be in effect within the useful
+lifetime of the IMAP toolkit. We have therefore chosen to adhere to
+these precedents.
+
+ The purpose of a calendar is to reckon time in advance, to show
+how many days have to elapse until a certain event takes place in the
+future, such as the harvest or the release of a new version of Pine.
+The earliest calendars, naturally, were crude and tended to be based
+upon the seasons or the lunar cycle.
+
+
+ANCIENT CALENDARS
+
+ The calendar of the Assyrians, for example, was based upon the
+phases of the moon. They knew that a lunation (the time from one full
+moon to the next) was 29 1/2 days long, so their lunar year had a
+duration of 354 days. This fell short of the solar year by about 11
+days. (The exact time for the solar year is approximately 365 days, 5
+hours, 48 minutes, and 46 seconds.) After 3 years, such a lunar
+calendar would be off by a whole month, so the Assyrians added an extra
+month from time to time to keep their calendar in synchronization with
+the seasons.
+
+ The best approximation that was possible in antiquity was a 19-year
+period, with 7 of these 19 years having 13 months (leap months). This
+scheme was adopted as the basis for the lunar calendar used by the
+Hebrews. The Arabs also used this calendar until Mohammed forbade
+shifting from 12 months to 13 months; this causes the Muslim holy month
+of Ramadan to move backwards through the seasons, completing a cycle
+every 32 1/2 years.
+
+ When Rome emerged as a world power, the difficulties of making a
+calendar were well known, but the Romans complicated their lives because
+of their superstition that even numbers were unlucky. Hence their
+months were 29 or 31 days long, with the exception of February, which
+had 28 days. Every second year, the Roman calendar included an extra
+month called Mercedonius of 22 or 23 days to keep up with the solar
+year.
+
+
+JULIAN CALENDAR
+
+ Even this algorithm was very poor, so that in 45 BCE, Caesar,
+advised by the astronomer Sosigenes, ordered a sweeping reform. By
+imperial decree, the year 46 BCE was made 445 days long to bring the
+calendar back in step with the seasons. The new calendar, similar to
+the one we now use was called the Julian calendar (named after Julius
+Caesar).
+
+ Months in the Julian calendar were 30 or 31 days in length and
+every fourth year was made a leap year (having 366 days) by adding a day
+to the end of the year. This leap year rule was not consistantly
+applied until 8 CE. The year-ending month of February, never a popular
+month, was presently shortened so that Julius Caesar and Emperor
+Augustus could each have long months named after them.
+
+ Caesar also decreed that the year would start with the first of
+January, which since 153 BCE was the day that Roman consuls took office,
+and not the vernal equinox in late March. Not everyone accepted that
+part of his reform, as we shall see.
+
+
+GREGORIAN CALENDAR
+
+ Caesar's year was 11 1/2 minutes short of the calculations
+recommended by Sosigenes and eventually the date of the vernal equinox
+began to drift. Roger Bacon became alarmed and sent a note to Pope
+Clement IV, who apparently was not impressed. Pope Sixtus IV later
+became convinced that another reform was needed and called the German
+astronomer, Regiomontanus, to Rome to advise him. Unfortunately,
+Regiomontanus died of the plague shortly thereafter and the plans died
+as well.
+
+ In 1545, the Council of Trent authorized Pope Gregory XIII to
+reform the calendar once more. Most of the mathematical work was done
+by Father Christopher Clavius, S.J. The immediate correction that was
+adopted was that Thursday, October 4, 1582 was to be the last day of the
+Julian calendar. The next day was Friday, with the date of October 15.
+For long range accuracy, a formula suggested by the Vatican librarian
+Aloysius Giglio was adopted. It said that every fourth year is a leap
+year except for century years that are not divisible by 400. Thus 1700,
+1800 and 1900 would not be leap years, but 2000 would be a leap year
+since 2000 is divisible by 400. This rule eliminates 3 leap years every
+4 centuries, making the calendar sufficiently correct for most ordinary
+purposes. This calendar is known as the Gregorian calendar and is the
+one that we now use today.
+
+ It is interesting to note that in 1582, all the Protestant princes
+ignored the papal decree and so many countries continued to use the
+Julian calendar until either 1698 or 1752. Britain and its American
+colonies went from Wednesday, September 2, 1752 to Thursday, September
+14. Prior to the changeover, the British used March 25 as the start of
+the new year.
+
+ In Russia, it needed the revolution to introduce the Gregorian
+calendar in 1918. Turkey didn't adopt it until 1927.
+
+
+NUMBERING OF YEARS
+
+ The numbering of the year is generally done according to an "era",
+such as the year of a ruler's reign.
+
+ In about 525, a monk named Dionysius Exiguus suggested that the
+calculated year of Jesus' birth be designated as year 1 in the Julian
+calendar. This suggestion was adopted over the next 500 years and
+subsequently followed in the Gregorian calendar.
+
+ For the benefit of those who seek religious significance to the
+calendar millenium, note that year 1 is too late by at least 4 years.
+Herod the Great, named in the Christian Bible as having all children in
+Bethlehem put to death in an attempt to kill the infant Jesus, died in 4
+BCE.
+
+ Nothing particularly significant of an historic or religious nature
+happened in Gregorian year 1; however it has become a worldwide standard
+as the "common era." In modern times, the terms "CE" (common era) and
+"BCE" (before common era) are preferred over the earlier (and, as we
+have seen, less accurate) "AD" (anno Domini, "the year of the Lord") and
+"BC" (before Christ).
+
+ The Hebrew lunar calendar begins at 3760 BCE, the year of creation
+in Jewish tradition. The Muslim lunar calendar begins on July 16, 622,
+when Mohammed fled from Mecca to Medina.
+
+ The Japanese, Taiwanese, and North Koreans use the Gregorian
+calendar, but number the year by political era. In Japan, an era
+begins when an emperor succeeds to the throne; year 1 of the Heisei
+era was 1989 when Emperor Akihito ascended to the throne (the first
+few days of 1989 was year 64 of the Shouwa era). In Taiwan, year 1 is
+the first full year after the founding of the Republic of China in 1911.
+In North Korea, year 1 is the year of the Juche (self-reliance) ideal,
+corresponding to the birth year of founder Kim Il-Sung (1912). Thus,
+year 2000 is Heisei 12 (Japan), 89th year of the Republic (Taiwan),
+and Juche 89 (North Korea).
+
+
+FURTHER MODIFICATIONS TO THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR
+
+ Despite the great accuracy of the Gregorian calendar, it still
+falls behind very slightly every few years. The most serious problem
+is that the earth's rotation is slowing gradually. If you are very
+concerned about this problem, we suggest that you tune in short wave
+radio station WWV or the Global Positioning System, which broadcasts
+official time signals for use in the United States. About once every
+3 years, they declare a leap second at which time you should be
+careful to adjust your system clock. If you have trouble picking up
+their signals, we suggest you purchase an atomic clock (not part of
+the IMAP toolkit).
+
+ Another problem is that the Gregorian calendar represents a year
+of 365.2425 days, whereas the actual time taken for the earth to
+rotate around the Sun is 365.2421991 days. Thus, the Gregorian calendar
+is actually 26 seconds slow each year, resulting in the calendar
+being one day behind every 3,300 or so years (a Y3.3K problem).
+
+ Consequently, the Gregorian calendar has been modified with a
+further rule, which is that years evenly divisible by 4000 are not
+leap years. Thus, the year 4000 will not be a leap year. Or, at
+least we assume that's what will happen assuming that the calendar
+remains unchanged for the next 2000 years.
+
+ The modified Gregorian calendar represents a year of 365.24225
+days. Thus, the modified Gregorian calendar is actually 4 seconds
+slow each year, resulting in the calendar being one day slow every
+20,000 or so years. So there will be a Y20K problem.
+
+ There is some dispute whether the modified Gregorian calendar was
+officially adopted, or if it's just a proposal. Other options (see
+below) exist; fortunately no decision needs to be made for several
+centuries yet.
+
+ There is code in c-client to support the modified Gregorian
+calendar, although it is currently disabled. Sometime in the next
+2000 years, someone will need to enable this code so that c-client is
+Y4K compiliant. Then, 18,000 years from now, someone will have to
+tear into c-client's code to fix the Y20K bug.
+
+
+EASTERN ORTHODOX MODIFICATION OF THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR
+
+ The Eastern Orthodox church in 1923 established its own rules to
+correct the Julian calendar. In their calendar, century years modulo
+900 must result in value of 200 or 600 to be considered a leap year.
+Both the Orthodox and Gregorian calendar agree that the years 2000 and
+2400 will be leap years, and the years 1900, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2500,
+2600, 2700 are not. However, the year 2800 will be a leap year in the
+Gregorian calendar but not in the Orthodox calendar; similarly, the
+year 2900 will be a leap year in the Orthodox calendar but not in the
+Gregorian calendar. Both calendars will agree that 3000 and
+3100 are leap years, but will disagree again in 3200 and 3300.
+
+ There is code in c-client to support the Orthodox calendar. It
+can be enabled by adding -DUSEORTHODOXCALENDAR=1 to the c-client
+CFLAGS, e.g.
+ make xxx EXTRACFLAGS="-DUSEORTHODOXCALENDAR=1"
+
+ The Orthodox calendar represents a year of 365.24222222... days.
+Thus, the Orthodox calendar is actually 2 seconds slow each year,
+resulting in the calendar being one day slow every 40,000 or so years.
+The Eastern Orthodox church has not yet made any statements on how the
+Y40K bug will be fixed.
+
+
+OTHER ISSUES AFFECTING THE CALENDAR IN THE FUTURE
+
+ The effect of leap seconds also needs to be considered when
+looking at the Y3.3K/Y4K, Y20K, and Y40K problems. Leap seconds put
+the clock back in line with the Earth's rotation, whereas leap years
+put the calendar back in line with the Earth's revolution. Since leap
+seconds slow down the clock (and hence the calendar), they actually
+bring the day of reckoning for the Gregorian and Orthodox calendars
+sooner.
+
+ Another factor is that the next ice age (technically, the end of
+the current interglacial period; we are in the middle of an ice age
+now!) is due around Y25K. It is not known what perturbations this will
+cause on the Earth's rotation and revolution, nor what calendar
+adjustments will be necessary at that time.
+
+ Hence my use of "or so" in predicting the years that the calendar
+will fall behind. The actual point may be anywhere from decades (in the
+case of Y3.3K) to millenia (in the case of Y40K) off from these predictions.
+
+
+MEANINGS OF DAY NAMES
+
+ The names of days of the week from a combination of Roman and
+Germanic names for celestial bodies:
+. Sunday Latin "dies solis" => "Sun's day"
+. Monday Latin "dies lunae" => "Moon's day"
+. Tuesday Germanic "Tiw's day" => "Mars' day"
+. Wednesday Germanic "Woden's day" => "Mercury's day"
+. Thursday Germanic "Thor's day" => "Jupiter's day"
+. Friday Germanic "Frigg's day" => "Venus' day"
+. Saturday Latin "dies Saturni" => "Saturn's day"
+
+
+MEANINGS OF MONTH NAMES
+
+ The names of the months are from the Roman calendar:
+. January Janus, protector of doorways
+. February Februalia, a time for sacrifice to atone for sins
+. March Mars, god of war
+. April Latin "aperire" => "to open" buds
+. May Maia, goddess of plant growth
+. June Latin "juvenis" => "youth"
+. July Julius Caesar
+. August Augustus Caesar
+. September Latin "septem" => "seven"
+. October Latin "octo" => "eight"
+. November Latin "novem" => "nine"
+. December Latin "decem" => "ten"
+
+ As you'll notice, the last four months are numbered 7 to 10, which
+is an artifact of the time when the new year started in March.
+
+
+INTERESTING FORMULAE
+
+ There's another reason why the historical starting of the new year
+is significant. Starting with March, the length of months follows a
+mathematical series:
+ 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31 31 28
+
+ This means that you can calculate the day of week for any
+arbitrary day/month/year of the Gregorian calendar with the following
+formula (note all divisions are integral):
+ _ _
+ | 7 + 31*(m - 1) y y y |
+ dow = | d + -------------- + y + - - --- + --- | MOD 7
+ |_ 12 4 100 400_|
+where
+ d := day of month (1..31)
+ m := month in old style (March = 1..February = 12)
+ y := year in old style
+ dow := day of week (Tuesday = 0..Monday = 6)
+
+ To convert from new style month/year to old style:
+ if (m > 2) m -= 2; /* Mar-Dec: subtract 2 from month */
+ else m += 10,y--; /* Jan-Feb: months 11 & 12 of previous year */
+
+ Here's another fun formula. To find the number of days between two
+days, calculate a pair of calendar days with the formula (again, all
+divisions are integral), using new style month/year this time:
+ m
+ m + -
+ 8 y y y
+ d + 30 * (m - 1) + ----- + y * 365 + - - --- + --- - ld
+ 2 4 100 400
+
+where:
+ d := day of month (1..31)
+ m := month in new style (January = 1..December = 12)
+ y := year in new style
+ ld := leap day correction factor:
+ 0 for January and February in non-leap years
+ 1 for January and February in leap years
+ 2 for all other months in all years
+
+ In C code, the leap day correction factor is calculated as:
+ (m < 3) ? !(y % 4) && ((y % 100) || !(y % 400)) : 2
+
+ It's up to you to figure out how to adapt these formulas for the
+Y4K bugfix and the Orthodox calendar. If you're really clever, try to
+use these formulae to implement the C library ctime(), gmtime(), and
+mktime() functions. Most C library implementations use a table of the
+number of days in a month. You don't need it.
+
+
+ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
+
+The original version is from an old Digital Equipment Corporation SPR
+answer for VMS. Modifications for c-client, and additional information
+added by Mark Crispin.